Mandatory foreclosure mediation for houses pushed

Share

Rep. Janet Maratita (Ind-Saipan) introduced a bill establishing foreclosure mediation for all principal residences, saying this will help families avoid losing their homes in times of financial difficulties.

“It’s a win-win bill especially for the homeowners. Many of our people are losing their homes due to financial constraints, either because of unemployment, death or medical expense of a family member, 25-percent cut in pension, etc. I hope this bill will alleviate foreclosures of primary residential,” Maratita, a Saipan senatorial candidate, told Saipan Tribune Wednesday.

House Bill 18-203 establishes a program assuring the availability of mediation and application of the federal Home Affordable Modification Program, or HAMP, requirements on foreclosure of a mortgage on any dwelling house of four units or less that is occupied by the owner as a principal residence.

This only applies to foreclosure actions involving loans that are subject to the federal HAMP guidelines.

Under the bill, a qualified mediator is someone licensed to practice law in the state and is required to have taken a specialized, continuing legal education training course on foreclosure prevention or loss mitigation approved by the CNMI Bar Association.

The parties’ rights in a foreclosure action are not waived by their participation in mediation under the bill.

Haidee V. Eugenio | Reporter
Haidee V. Eugenio has covered politics, immigration, business and a host of other news beats as a longtime journalist in the CNMI, and is a recipient of professional awards and commendations, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s environmental achievement award for her environmental reporting. She is a graduate of the University of the Philippines Diliman.

Related Posts

Disclaimer: Comments are moderated. They will not appear immediately or even on the same day. Comments should be related to the topic. Off-topic comments would be deleted. Profanities are not allowed. Comments that are potentially libelous, inflammatory, or slanderous would be deleted.