Previous Story
On Pagan mining controversy
|
Posted on May 29 2004
I couldn’t agree more with Peter J.P. Perez that the mounting controversy on proposals to mine pozzolan from Pagan needs less spin but more facts. I’m talking about factual facts not spins presented as facts.
The issue merits public discussion via a public hearing to hear the sentiments of the indigenous people on an issue of relevance to their livelihood. Has MPLA done this? If not, why not? What’s the idea of keeping Northern Islanders from reviewing and expressing their sentiments on proposals between Azmar and other companies? Isn’t there a need for an environmental impact study of the proposed project?
A restoration program isn’t a guarantee to returning the pristine nature of the island back to its original form after the last truck rolls out of sight. What if the company dissolves before the end of the contract? Who would ensure payment and enforcement of the restoration program? It certainly leaves a lot of unanswered questions which islanders wish to find out from Azmar International and other interested companies.
I have been to the Republic of Nauru and have seen the ugly results of environmental degradation and destruction. The last I heard, the government plans to buy and ferry tons of dirt from Australia to fill-in the deep phosphate cavities that stand as a reminder of what exploitation and permanent destruction can do to an island community exploited to the hilt.
Let’s not rush a decision. After all, we are the trustees of Marianas Public Land. Let’s protect it, as did our forefathers for generations.
John S. DelRosario, Jr.
Koblerville
