Nearby: Japanese casino

Share

As we tango out of step about our impending wealth from casino, a news story from Reuters (printed recently in the Japan Times) discusses plans by two U.S. casino giants eyeing either Osaka or Tokyo as the next ripe market for their venture.

Most folks here missed it as to deny our assessing its impact on our “Midnight Hour” casino industry. Aren’t we supposed to have the foresight and vision to weigh how this would play against the industry here? We can’t brave ignorance on this score.

“Two U.S. billionaires are betting on rival cities, Tokyo and Osaka, to be the first in Japan to open casino resorts—once the government gives the go-ahead to legalize gambling.

“Japan is one of the world’s last untapped gaming markets and could become the third largest gambling destination after Macau and the United States, with annual revenue of over $40 billion, according to broker CLSA.

“Lawmakers who support legalizing casino gambling hope to see initial draft legislation this year, with the first resort opening by 2020, when Tokyo hosts the Olympic Games.

“In a race for first-mover advantage, 76-year-old Chicago real estate mogul Neil Bluhm has set his sights on the southern commercial hub of Osaka, while Las Vegas gaming tycoon Sheldon Adelson, four years his senior, is putting his weight behind a Tokyo flagship resort.

“Bluhm, who owns casinos in Pennsylvania, Chicago and Niagara Falls, has a net worth of $2.6 billion, according to Forbes. The former lawyer and now head of Rush Gaming believes Osaka, one of Chicago’s ‘sister cities,’ has the kind of flexible local government that will help drive this project, and, crucially, has ‘shovel ready’ casino sites.

“While Adelson hasn’t ruled out pitching for Osaka too, he sees Tokyo as the main prize, given its highly affluent 13.2 million population. The CEO of Las Vegas Sands Corp, who Forbes says is worth close to $39 billion, has pledged to spend $10 billion as Japan opens up to legal gambling—an offer he says his rivals can’t match.

“Sands, which has casinos in Macau, Singapore and Las Vegas, remain bullish on its Japan plans given the country’s wealthy population and proximity to China. ‘We are very confident in our ability to generate a return that would be satisfactory to our shareholders,’ George Tanasijevich, managing director for global development, said in a phone interview. He did not elaborate.”

Japan is a very wealthy nation with 26 million multi-millionaires, many of whom are retired folks. It generates $40 billion annually in revenues. It has the infrastructure—wealthy folks—to support its industry. If other wealthy nations work the clock to lure the rest of Asia’s wealthy, where would the CNMI casino industry secure its share of the market?

Why are Adelson and Bluhm headed to Japan and not the CNMI? What did they miss of the CNMI that they should know about other than its reputation in Washington as a “welfare state” gift-wrapped in “corruption”? Or what happens to the Saipan casino when wealthy Japan opens up in less than six years? Aren’t we preparing an industry to eventually fail?

Why is the focus of casino fees strictly on retirees’ pension? What about the larger community and the need to defray the cost of education, health, and public safety? What myopic view, ignoring the majority’s needs.

Finally, what if there’s a serious geopolitical rift in Southeast Asia between China, Japan, Vietnam, and the Philippines? Remember the Asian financial flu? It instantly took the wind out of our tourism industry. Do you see how easily this industry could be derailed and paralyzed? Vision: Anybody?

Hangover refuses to leave
Memories last forever, especially sweet ones. We once had millions of dollars. Our coffers were loaded and overflowing as the party goes on 24/7. We were inebriated by the good times of the boom years. We hold unto the darn hangover of the good old times!
Today we look around, wobbly, broke though stubbornly singing, “Don’t worry, be happy, it’s only bankruptcy!” Did I miss something?
***
In my days as the CNMI’s delegate to what’s now the South Pacific Community, I’ve visited islands south of the equator to attend meetings of representatives and annual conferences.
Tahiti remains that indelible experience I’ve had with real island hospitality. Like my kanaka braddah said, “Eh, if you’ve never been to heaven, Tahiti’s one more step to heaven.”
I asked him to compare it to Saipan. He looked at me a bit embarrassed but related “Dis place braddah is the reverse where you get to meet the chief downstairs named Lucy.” Gee! I had my laugh of a lifetime. It’s all about common courtesy, true?
Honolulu ranks second while Saipan and Noumea are last on my list. The aloof Frenchman at the immigration counter has no inkling what hospitality entails. He flashes a “screw you” smile. The guys and gals need tons of training in the hospitality business given that the airport is our front door in tourism.
***
Obamacare has forced increases in healthcare premiums beyond the reach of average, low-income regular workers and retirees here. Obama’s promise of reducing healthcare cost by $2,500 or you could “keep you plan…doctor” has failed royally too. Yet he continues preaching to the multitude as though it has been one grand success. But then he loves listening to his voice, not his scattered thoughts on a slew of lies!
***
Moving police officers closer to the community is an outstanding program. It’s a deterrent in every sense of the word. It puts Magellan’s Troops in their place. It feels good seeing a patrol car around the neighborhood. It’s when their visit is scarce that begins to tie knots in my tummy. Good work Commissioner Deleon Guerrero!

John S. Del Rosario Jr. | Contributing Author
John DelRosario Jr. is a former publisher of the Saipan Tribune and a former secretary of the Department of Public Lands.

Related Posts

Disclaimer: Comments are moderated. They will not appear immediately or even on the same day. Comments should be related to the topic. Off-topic comments would be deleted. Profanities are not allowed. Comments that are potentially libelous, inflammatory, or slanderous would be deleted.