Chamber suggests pension cuts

By
|
Posted on Jan 15 2012
Share
Larger cuts for retired elected officials, judges
By Haidee V. Eugenio
Reporter

The Saipan Chamber of Commerce is recommending ways to help improve the NMI Retirement Fund’s fiscal conditions, including a 5- to 7-percent cut in current retirees’ benefits and higher cuts in benefits paid to retired government officials such as governors, lawmakers and judges, as well as further spending cuts in government.

This early, some retirees are supporting the proposal.

Mario Taitano, a retiree, said yesterday if the recommendation is an “across-the-board” cut in benefits, then that is something he would support.

“There are so many ways that the three branches of government could help the Fund. But if we’re talking about benefit cut as the Chamber is recommending, then I’m all for it if it’s not more than 10 percent and if it is across the board,” Taitano told Saipan Tribune.

Douglas Brennan, Chamber president, said the Chamber has spoken with current Fund retirees who have said that the “most realistic” cut in pensions they are “more than willing to agree to” is 5 percent to 7 percent.

“That, combined with larger reductions in benefits paid to retired legislators, governors, lieutenant governors, secretaries, directors, judges and other high-income earners would decrease the $70 million annually paid out,” Brennan said.

He said any reduction in paid benefits should immediately be invested to earn badly needed income for the Retirement Fund.

“If 50 percent of that $70 million were invested, the Fund would correct its downward spiral,” he said.

Brennan said the Chamber believes the much more can be accomplished through further reductions in the CNMI government’s spending.

In fiscal year 2011, for example, preliminary government data shows a $25.8 million budget deficit, bringing the cumulative figure to some $370 million. This, despite austerity measures that include 16-hour cuts biweekly and unpaid holidays.

Brennan said the bottom line is that “the CNMI government needs to function in a more business-like manner in order to protect and serve their employees.”

“Through reductions in benefits to more realistic and sustainable levels and greater accountability to the island residents, voters and taxpayers, it is possible the Retirement Fund can be saved,” he said.

Rep. Teresita Santos (Ind-Rota), chair of the Special House Committee on the Retirement Fund, said her panel welcomes any suggestion, recommendation, or approach in trying to resolve the Fund’s financial problems.

“As the old saying goes, two heads [are] better than one,” Santos said, adding that the Chamber’s suggestions will be taken into consideration as the committee prepares its findings and recommendations to the full House of Representatives.

Santos’ committee has started conducting meetings with agencies affected by pending bills and initiatives that seek to help the Fund, and these include the Fund, the Department of Public Land,s and the Marianas Public Land Trust. The next meeting is tentatively set for Thursday.

The freshman lawmaker said they also plan to call in retirees and the public to directly hear from them their recommendations on how to save the Fund, as well as their comments on proposals to save the pension agency.

Brennan said the Chamber believes the Fund “should more closely mirror other existing retirement programs.”

“The CNMI Retirement Fund benefits for retirees are almost unprecedented. That, combined with Fund contribution rates for CNMI employees and the government, have led to the Retirement Fund ‘perfect storm’ we are now witnessing during the CNMI’s sharp economic decline,” said Brennan, who is also the general manager of Microl Corp.

The Saipan Chamber of Commerce, the largest business organization in the CNMI with some 150 members, said this is the first time in its history that it is stating its position on what should be done to improve the Fund’s fiscal condition.

“Our interest in the stability of the Fund is purely economic. The CNMI and its employees now comprise our single largest consumer group. We need to protect and preserve their livelihood. Allowing the Retirement Fund to collapse would have an extremely negative impact on our islands for many years to come. Government employees and retirees are terrified their ‘golden years’ will be spent in poverty,” he said.

Brennan said the Chamber is offering the Fund, the Legislature, and the Office of the Governor its positions on how to improve the Fund’s situation “as a result of the lack of fiscal integrity of the CNMI Retirement Fund, and after numerous attempts by the CNMI Legislature to increase taxes, add a sales tax, decrease rebates or tap other funding sources as a way to assist the NMIRF with its worsening condition.”

The Chamber said a review of the information it has shows that the CNMI’s 2010 fourth quarter deficit stood at approximately $330 million. Of that deficit, nearly 80 percent was a Retirement Fund debt liability, it said.

“If that Fund liability was retired in the proper manner, the CNMI government wouldn’t really be that bad off,” the Chamber said. “The CNMI, not that long ago, essentially had $250 million to spend. Today it’s $100 million. Absolutely, all caution should be exercised to not further decrease revenue to the CNMI, but the real dilemma is to find ways to decrease the demand upon the Retirement Fund itself.”

The Chamber said its Government Relations and Economic Development Committee and the board of directors maintain that one of the first steps that should be taken is to reduce the benefits currently being paid to current CNMI retirees, as well as to future Fund beneficiaries.

“An external audit should be undertaken to determine if there have been any irregularities in payouts, and if so, measures should be taken to recover those funds,” it added.

admin
Disclaimer: Comments are moderated. They will not appear immediately or even on the same day. Comments should be related to the topic. Off-topic comments would be deleted. Profanities are not allowed. Comments that are potentially libelous, inflammatory, or slanderous would be deleted.